| dc.rights.license | http://creativecommons.org/licenses/by-nc-sa/3.0/ve/ | es_VE |
| dc.contributor.author | Cartay, Rafael | |
| dc.contributor.author | Piñero, E. Alexander | |
| dc.date.accessioned | 2022-05-13T15:42:53Z | |
| dc.date.available | 2022-05-13T15:42:53Z | |
| dc.date.issued | 2022-05-13 | |
| dc.identifier.issn | 1316-7790 | |
| dc.identifier.uri | http://www.saber.ula.ve/handle/123456789/48012 | |
| dc.description.abstract | Este artículo se deriva de una investigación descriptiva, documental
e histórica, basada en fuentes secundarias diversas para analizar
y resumir diferentes aspectos económicos, políticos y sociales que
intentar explicar el contexto socioeconómico y político ecuatoriano
en el que se inserta la Revolución Liberal, fi nalizando el siglo XIX y
iniciando el XX, comandada por el general liberal Eloy Alfaro. Tras
triunfar en 1895 su gobierno emprendió, en medio de graves dificultades económicas,
la construcción del ferrocarril trasandino con el
propósito de unificar físicamente el país, integrar sus mercados y movilizar
el ejército para combatir las insurrecciones internas y defender
las fronteras nacionales. La obra, que conectaba a Guayaquil y Quito,
fue inaugurada en 1908 en medio de una gran inestabilidad política. El
ferrocarril a vapor era visto, entonces, como el símbolo del progreso, y
fue presentado como la obra magna de la gestión alfarista y su mayor
aporte al proyecto de integración nacional. Sin embargo, no cumplió
a cabalidad los objetivos planteados. El Ferrocarril Trasandino no
pudo integrar el mercado interno porque la Sierra y la Costa tenían
economías no complementarias, desarrollos desiguales y clases hegemónicas
con intereses distintos e irreconciliables. Si bien la vía férrea
logró vincular físicamente a la Sierra con la Costa, esa relación se hizo
de una manera parcial, irregular y a un costo tan alto que no justificó
el enorme esfuerzo, económico, político y social, invertido para culminarla. | es_VE |
| dc.language.iso | es | es_VE |
| dc.publisher | SaberULA | es_VE |
| dc.rights | info:eu-repo/semantics/openAccess | es_VE |
| dc.subject | Ferrocarril trasandino | es_VE |
| dc.subject | Ecuador | es_VE |
| dc.subject | Siglo XIX | es_VE |
| dc.subject | Sierra | es_VE |
| dc.subject | Costa | es_VE |
| dc.subject | Clases hegemónicas | es_VE |
| dc.subject | Exportación de cacao | es_VE |
| dc.title | El papel del ferrocarril en la construcción del proyecto nacional de la Revolución Liberal Alfarista (1895-1912) | es_VE |
| dc.title.alternative | The role of the railroad in the construction of the national project of the alfarista liberal revolution (1895-1912) | es_VE |
| dc.type | info:eu-repo/semantics/article | es_VE |
| dcterms.dateAccepted | 20/07/2020 | |
| dcterms.dateSubmitted | 15/06/2020 | |
| dc.description.abstract1 | This article is derived from a descriptive, documentary and historical
research, based on diverse secondary sources to analyze and
summarize different economic, political and social aspects that try to
explain the Ecuadorian socioeconomic and political context in which
the Liberal Revolution was inserted, based on the end of the XIX century
and the beginning of the XX century, commanded by the liberal
general Eloy Alfaro. After his triumph in 1895, this government undertook
–in the midst of serious economic diffi culties– the construction
of the Trans-Andean railroad with the purpose of physically unifying
the country, as well as integrating its markets and mobilizing the army
to combat internal insurrections and defend the national borders. This
construction, which connected Guayaquil and Quito cities, was inaugurated
in 1908 in the midst of great political instability. The steam railroad
was seen, by then, as the symbol of progress, and was presented
as the masterpiece of the Alfarista administration and its greatest contribution
to the national integration project. However, it did not fully
meet its stated objectives. First of all, the Trans-Andean Railroad could
not integrate the internal market, because the highlands (sierra region)
and the coast had non-complementary economies and also unequal development.
Secondly, there were hegemonic classes with different and
irreconcilable interests. Although the railroad was able to physically
link the highlands with the coast, this relationship was partial, irregular
and at such a high cost that it did not justify the enormous economic,
political and social effort invested to complete it. | es_VE |
| dc.description.colacion | 141-170 | es_VE |
| dc.description.email | rafaelcartay@hotmail.com | es_VE |
| dc.description.email | epinero@utm.edu.ec | es_VE |
| dc.description.frecuencia | Semestral | |
| dc.description.paginaweb | http://www.saber.ula.ve/agoratrujillo/ | |
| dc.identifier.depositolegal | pp199802ME291 | |
| dc.identifier.eissn | 2244-8454 | |
| dc.publisher.pais | Venezuela | es_VE |
| dc.subject.institucion | Universidad de Los Andes | es_VE |
| dc.subject.keywords | Trans-Andean railroad | es_VE |
| dc.subject.keywords | Ecuador | es_VE |
| dc.subject.keywords | XIX century | es_VE |
| dc.subject.keywords | Sierra region | es_VE |
| dc.subject.keywords | Coast | es_VE |
| dc.subject.keywords | Hegemonic classes | es_VE |
| dc.subject.keywords | Cocoa exports | es_VE |
| dc.subject.seccion | Revista Ágora: Artículos | es_VE |
| dc.subject.tipo | Artículos | es_VE |
| dc.type.media | Texto | es_VE |